|
Dailydave
mailing list archives
Re: VPC
From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr () watson org>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:59:18 -0500 (EST)
hey,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Matt Richard wrote:
[snip]
I have only seen defensive implementations such as the work of
Garfinkel and Rosenblum at Stanford. Their use case is a modified
hypervisor that can monitor critical OS data structures. One of their
implementations watches the Linux system call table and can prevent
modification to thwart rootkits.
http://www.cs.fit.edu/%7Epkc/id/related/garfinkel03ndssVM.pdf
Admittedly I just browsed this paper (so please forgive any poor
assumptions I make), but it seems their sys call protection scheme just
monitors the syscall table structure and not the actual syscall code. My
point being -- for a long time people have just done jmp overwrites at the
beginning (or other known to be "ok" location) of the system call they are
hooking so that they don't have to touch the values in the syscall table.
Am I wrong about what they protect? If so, my fault!! :D
Cheers,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: VPC, (continued)
- Re: VPC Thierry Zoller (Feb 22)
- Re: VPC Alexander Sotirov (Feb 24)
- Re: VPC Anthony Lineberry (Feb 28)
- Re: VPC Matt Richard (Feb 29)
- Re: VPC Jon Oberheide (Feb 29)
- Re: VPC Andrew R. Reiter (Mar 03)
- Re: VPC Thierry Zoller (Feb 23)
- Re: VPC Rodrigo Rubira Branco (BSDaemon) (Feb 29)
|