Dailydave: Re: The lack of hard questions

[Charles Miller <cmiller () securityevaluators com>]

But the problem is, if there are only a handful of people who can make  
a reliable exploit for a particular vulnerability (or not) and none of  
them work for MS, how can MS accurately determine whether an exploit  
for a particular vulnerability will be somewhat reliable or totally  
reliable (or not possible at all)?  Doesn't anyone remember gobbles :)


On Aug 27, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:05:42 EDT, Pusscat said:
> > My assumption would be that if it can be made reliable by anyone,  
> > then it's
> > reliable. It probably shouldn't be a quantum value, collapsed by our
> > inability ;)
> Yes, it only has to be weaponized once.
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave