Home page logo
/

dailydave logo Dailydave mailing list archives

Re: Faster, smashter. (fwd)
From: "Jon Passki" <jon.passki () hursk com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:59:21 +0900

Yeah, but I would not be the one to figure out the value.  I would ask
Immunity Sec if they had an exploit on ManOS that gave me, for example,
local root access accessible from any user.  If Immunity Sec did confirm a
0day that met my criteria, the next question is then asking them what my
cost would be for the 0day.  I now have a ceiling cost, even though the cost
may be hugely inflated.  I may never care whatsoever on purchasing that 0day
from Immunity Sec.  Also, they might not like me and change me a higher cost
than someone else.  If I have more oracles to contact, then I can gauge a
better market value.

Yes, there are details, with whatever devils hiding in there.  There is also
some nice properties, but with risk..  Immunity Sec need not expose the
actual 0day.  There's risk they may lie to me, though.  The only exposure is
that a set of given properties on some exploit may be publicly disclosed.
From Immutiy Sec's perspecitve, though, they now can analysis the number of
queries across vendors and applications and see what the "public" cares
about.  Maybe 13% of all queries relate to some version of WebSphere on AIX
5.4 (shudder). They now have market intellegence that may drive research and
development into platforms not perceived to be viable.  So, that
intelligence may definitely out weight the loss of size of their "market
cap" on exploits.  Other devils are in classifications.  But, seriously,
that's something I could see reasonably being taken care of overtime for
most general exploits.  Sure, some just won't be able to be classified.  So
what if a vast majority can.  Perfection, enemy, good, blah blah blah.


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:42 PM, BEES INC <bees.inc () gmail com> wrote:

we are not talking about an auction though, we are talking about
derivatives.

As the name implies the price of a derivate is derived from the price
of some underlying asset. With commodities or equities you have a
market where the last price something traded at is readily available.
You take that price and a few other things, plug them into black
scholes and you have your theoretical option price that may be above
or below the market price for the option depending on sentiment and
the usual supply/demand.

Derivatives are also standardized, say an option on a share gets you 1
share, it only works if every share is equal. Not all 0days are
created equal. For instance take an 0day in ManOs, an experimental
operating system used predominately by physicists. How do you value
it? What did the last 0day for manos go for? Is that a reliable
indicator of this 0days price? The last one could've been kinda lame
and have lots of preconditions for it to be successful, but maybe this
one has no such conditions, and consequently worth a lot more. The
same contract wont fit.

It's probably safe to assume there is 0day for manos or exchange or
whatever, but pricing a derivative requires available access to the
pricing of the underlying and standardization of the terms. You could
classify the 0day in terms of severity and have different types for
that (like there are different types of oil contracts), and in general
I would agree an auction is probably the best way to gauge fair value,
but until you can get a fair value you're in a bit of a pickle (or
sausage)

Liquidity would also be a big issue. You would need a reasonable
number of players to make the market work, otherwise people would get
stuck holding illiquid, tricky to value derivatives and you just have
to take a look at the subprime debt market to see how well that works
out.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Jon Passki <jon.passki () hursk com> wrote:
I disagree.  Give me N number of oracles that state they know x, y, z
issue
is exploitable (at some defined level of exploitability) and I'll give
you
an auction.  The concept of an auction is from the perspective of the
buyer,
not the seller...  If Oracle A, B, D, and F state that they have an
exploit
for vuln Alpha, then I have a ceiling cost and a basement cost for the
exploit.  If I only have one Oracle, I still have a ceiling cost.  That's
still a good number for worst-case attack tree discussions.


On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:27 PM, BEES INC <bees.inc () gmail com> wrote:

i have postgrad applied finance qualifications and this is not really
practical. You need an open/free market on 0day before you could start
writing futures/options contracts. to my knowledge this doesn't exist,
and is unlikely to exist for a whole bunch of reasons. its more
profitable for exploit writers and cheaper for buyers to keep the
other side in the dark on going rates.

i remember they tried something like this in fresno county with the
sausage and spice prices there. though a little different from
exploits its similar in that its a fairly small and niche market, and
the supply was effectively controlled by a cartel, and pricing
information was dubious at best. needless to say it didn't take off

you would be better off writing insurance and collecting a premiums,
and if something does happen the payout could go to covering costs of
patching and recovery. i'm pretty sure ive read of something like this
being already available.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:19 PM,  <sinan.eren () immunitysec com> wrote:

(moderator: retry from subscribed account)

I have been thinking about a potential futures market model to hedge
the
risk
of software vulnerabilities. Perhaps a modified Black-Scholes-Merton
model that
could be tied into Microsoft's exploitability index to determine the
premium on
the future contract ? Hedgers (companies, govermantal institutions,
military
etc.) could than purchase these contracts from speculators (these
could
be us)
to tie their risk into a dollar amount. On the other hand researchers
can sell
these contracts if they feel strongly about a software or inversely,
buy
these
contracts to cash in their 0day when it hits the public domain. We
need
a fair
market place for 0day (outside of the 2 known players whose model
benefits no
one) and I believe futures market model is the way to go. After all if
you can
hedge your exposure to weather, why can't you hedge it against 0day ?
It
is not
as crazy as it sounds ....

I would appreciate ideas to tie the value of a vulnerability to a
premium, any
quants who do security as well ?

-sinan

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Dave Aitel wrote:

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1

 One technique we're doing this week with a client is taking an
attack
 tree and marking it up with dollar values. I.E. if you wanted to buy
 an 0day in X component, how much would it cost?

 This then is a simple summation to produce a "how much is it to get
 into the internal network from the internet" which the business can
 use to help them decide yay/nay on the project as a whole depending
on
 their own view of the threat and the value of the information they
are
 protecting.

 -dave


 Halvar Flake wrote:
 Hey all,

 It seems that discussions in ITsec are periodic -- the same
 discussions and same arguments come up again and again.

 1. Of course attackers use new vulnerabilities. It is the nature
of
 offense. Defense is done "to the maximum of current knowledge".
 Offense, by it's nature, has to expand on the status quo.

 2. How do you simulate an attack with a new vulnerability if you
 don't have one ?

 Well, military folks do wargames all the time without actually
 using up the arsenal they have on the shelves. Network attacks
 should probably be done in a similar manner -- have an umpire, and
 give the attacking team a few "0day cards". With these cards they
 get high-probability code execution for a piece of software of
 their choice.

 The pentest then proceeds like a game, but can be conducted on the
 real network, too.

 But I am repeating myself ...

 Cheers, Halvar _______________________________________________
 Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
 http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave






-- 
Cheers,

Jon Passki, Partner
The Hursk Group, LLC

"Obvia conspicimus, nubem pellente Mathesi."

e: jon.passki () hursk com
ph: 651/222.3020
cal:
http://www.google.com/calendar/hosted/hursk.com/embed?src=jon.passki%40hursk.com
pgp: 1BB0 A946 927B 93C3 ED6A  0466 6692 6C2C 84BE 4122
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]