Home page logo

educause logo Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: spam return address backlash
From: Roger Safian <r-safian () NORTHWESTERN EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:46:07 -0600

Thanks for everyone who responded to this.

As for the topic of rejecting bounces, while I
agree the RFC was written in a kindler gentler
time, I don't think that rejecting bounces is
a good idea.

The potential confusion caused by somebody
not receiving a bounce when they make a typo
will be a serious issue, IMHO.

I've been trying to think of a popular form of
communication that does not incorporate some
sort of notice that your intended communication
did not reach it's recipient.  I can't think of

Further...I hate to see the spammers win.
Perhaps rate limiting bounces might be
a useful compromise.

Roger A. Safian
r-safian () northwestern edu (email) public key available on many key servers.
(847) 491-4058   (voice)
(847) 467-6500   (Fax) "You're never too old to have a great childhood!"

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]