Home page logo
/

educause logo Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives

Re: Nevada's mandatory encryption law
From: David Shettler <dshettle () HOLYCROSS EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:18:38 -0400

I'm so glad ROT13 qualifies as encryption, as it would appear to under such
guidelines :)

-Dave

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Basgen, Brian <bbasgen () pima edu> wrote:

Oh Valdis, you ask for far too much! :)

"Encryption" means the use of any protective or disruptive measure,
including, without limitation, cryptography, enciphering, encoding or a
computer contaminant, to:
     1.  Prevent, impede, delay or disrupt access to any data, information,
image, program, signal or sound;
     2.  Cause or make any data, information, image, program, signal or
sound unintelligible or unusable; or
     3.  Prevent, impede, delay or disrupt the normal operation or use of
any component, device, equipment, system or network.
     (Added to NRS by 1999, 2704)

http://www.leg.state.nv.us/Nrs/NRS-205.html#NRS205Sec4742

 That is borderline comical. But alas, it is a step in the right direction.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Brian Basgen
Information Security
Pima Community College

________________________________________
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [
SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Valdis Kletnieks [
Valdis.Kletnieks () VT EDU]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:33 AM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Nevada's mandatory encryption law

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:31:27 PDT, "Basgen, Brian" said:

      (a) "Encryption" has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 205.4742.

I don't have that handy - does that definition rule out rot-13 and the
even more secure double-rot-13, and similar kiddy-krypto?


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]