Educause Security Discussion
mailing list archives
From: "Kellogg, Brian D." <bkellogg () SBU EDU>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:27:06 -0400
Our athletics department uses it as well. We have it placed in a
restricted/secured VLAN and have also used our Packetshaper to limit and
de-prioritize traffic to and from it. Despite what Dragonfly says it is
essentially a P2P application and therefore, in my opinion, should be
treated as such.
From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:14 PM
To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Dragonfly
Matthew Gracie wrote:
Di Fabio, Andrea wrote:
Are there institutions using Dragonfly from http://www.dragonfly.com
If so, I would be interested in hearing if you are shaping this
application's bandwidth or have taken any other measures to throttle
and control the IP addresses it talks to.
Our athletics department has this, and it is indeed an incredibly
bandwidth-greedy application. We've got it in a throttled class using
our Packetshaper, which seems to be mitigating the resource use.
Yes, it stinks to high heaven. As does XPressPlay, another favorite of
our athletics department.
Dragonfly is a rather specific protocol. XPressPlay is essentially
We let our Procera's volume based shaping sort them out.