|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
Re: chroot useful?
From: mcnabb () argus-systems com (Paul McNabb)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:27:17 -0600
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () cyber com au>
> >So, how many firewalls out there implemented with any of the common
> >operating systems (be they free or commercial) actually do this ?
>
> Why not ask them. Many claim to run "hardened" versions of
> BSD or LINUX. Vulnerabilites and exploits are well publicized,
> and many of the developers read these lists. I doubt many
> are going to be so arrogant as to take a NIH approach to something
> Marcus has contributed to the state of the technology ;-)
Well, the majority of the firewall market doesn't run on a "hardened"
version of the OS because that's not what FW-1 uses.
What % of the market do those selling hardened OS's make up ?
I get a bit confused, and I suspect I'm not alone, about the use of the
term "hardened OS". To me, a hardened OS is a modified OS, not just a
well-configured system (meaning tightened up and stripped down). I would
classify Sidewinder as a "hardened OS", and Firewall-1 on Solaris with
the Argus B3 extensions would be "hardened". I would also put into this
category those firewalls running on Linux systems where the kernel has
been modified for improved security.
Offhand, I can think of only two areas where hardening the underlying
OS helps:
1) protecting against daemon/proxy flaws, such as stack overwrite bugs,
that would allow an attacker to get a daemon/proxy to do something it
wasn't designed to do,
2) separating administration activities from firewall services, such as
when the firewall is administered via a network interface.
Packet filtering firewalls offering no network services and that are
administered via the console see only marginal benefit from a "hardened"
OS. The more the firewall is doing in user space, the more chance there
is for a problem and the more a hardened OS will help.
IMHO, stripping down a system by removing unnecessary utilities, services,
and processes reduces the chances of leaving a hole open and is absolutely
essential for making a firewall "secure", but it does little towards making
the remaining services more secure.
paul
---------------------------------------------------------
Paul McNabb Argus Systems Group, Inc.
Vice President and CTO 1809 Woodfield Drive
mcnabb () argus-systems com Savoy, IL 61874 USA
TEL 217-355-6308
FAX 217-355-1433 "Securing the Future"
---------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Firewalling DCOM and brethren, (continued)
Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 17)
RE: chroot useful? Joseph Judge (Nov 17)
Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 17)
Re: chroot useful? Anton J Aylward (Nov 20)
Re: chroot useful? Paul McNabb (Nov 20)
|