Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: chroot useful?
From: Adam Shostack <adam () homeport org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 14:52:11 -0500 (EST)

chuck yerkes wrote:

|   Using the PROTOCOLS of a GP/OS IS a good idea.  By this I mean
| that configuring via a file or a secure web server (or whatever)
| and logging via syslog is good.

        Logging via syslog is never good.
        
        Syslog throws away information intentionally (facility.level
is discarded).  Syslog throws information away accidentally, by using
UDP as its transport.  Syslog has limited support for fail over
logging if a log host dies.  Syslog has no sequence/acknowledgement at
the application level for reliably ensuring that the message got to
the loghost and was written to disk.  Syslog has no authentication or
integrity checks, but that was excusable at the time it was written.

        Syslog, by the fact that it exists, discourages people from
writing real logging tools for UNIX.  I won't even start on
monitoring.


Adam



-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
                                                       -Hume




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]