Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Facts, not Fiction
From: Andreas Siegert <afx () ibm de>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 11:33:50 +0100


Unless the customer is on an extreme low budget, I alway use a multistage
design. Anything else would be irresponsible in my opinion.

afx

-----Forwarded message from Hartmut.Fehling () Hamburg-Mannheimer de-----
How far DO YOU (all of you out there) trust the current products to do what
they are supposed to do?
Do you cascade them with other products with a similar function to ensure
that one bug doesn't open up all ports?
Or does everyone here at least use a combination of FW-Host + securely
configured internal Router?

-----End of forwarded message-----

-- 
Andreas Siegert       afx () ibm de / afx () barolo munich de ibm com / AFX at IPNET
PGP Key:http://www.muc.de/~afx/pubkey.asc, KeyId AB26FD05



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]