Re: H.323 proxy or ALG with support for NAT of RAS?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Isn't it better to move to SIP? h.323 is brain-dead and ugly as hell.

<phz13_at_yahoo.com> said :

> Is anyone aware of a firewall which can support the
> following scenario:
>
> Internal network using private IP addresses
> H.323 Gatekeeper has public IP address at service
> provider.
>
> I need a firewall which can support NAT of the H.323
> RAS messages. Is anyone aware of one?
>
> Please reply to me directly via email. I'll summarize
> if there's interest.

                                     _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1i

iQCVAwUBO7xd7aH/mIJW9LeBAQEREwP/XWjVfxcnwEShar2hd/zhUpM4TLYomRBC
CJQVzqdIHKzA2xvJI7ArSWrF0vLVwVn9vhy9ALF0hNWos4Zwpc83pbNzBS/FIRNM
W4mBS6LghFInavw8h/ATBghT4+jY49fU0R0aR2W0UxWUjr4HSB3o9EfgtXzpkfz9
RokwCp+BAgk=
=ELrt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_nfr.com
http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Oct 05 2001