Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: concerning ~el8 / project mayhem
From: Barney Wolff <barney () tp databus com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:28:29 -0400

Why on earth even spend time debating whether config reviews or scans
are better?  It's equivalent to debating whether structured walkthroughs
or testing work better to find software flaws.  Which is more important,
your left leg or your right?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:04:55AM -0400, Paul Robertson wrote:

While I am indeed advocating good design, I'm not against validation, I'm 
against vulnerability scanning- that, I think is our point of difference 
(or maybe I just didn't articulate it well.)  In other words, I'm saying 
that configuration validation is better than vulnerability testing for 
almost all classes of electronic attack.

-- 
Barney Wolff
I'm available by contract or FT:  http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]