Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Email Appliances
From: Mikael Olsson <mikael.olsson () clavister com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 20:58:42 +0200


Paul Robertson wrote:

[...] if you have one of those layer 8[1] problems.
[1] Political layer.

That would be layer 9, since the layer 8 security problem is, simply,
"users"[2]. "Execs" are typically layered above "users" in full conformance 
with basic layering principles[3].

/Mike

[2] I'm still upset about not getting to finish last year's Defcon TCP/IP 
    drinking game with that question. &%#¤#¤  (Hey, I was thirsty!)

[3] A high-abstraction layer doesn't know anything about what really 
    goes on in the lower layers, it simply uses them.[4]

[4] More footnotes than message body. Uh oh.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]