Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Email Appliances
From: Paul Robertson <proberts () patriot net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:43:34 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Mikael Olsson wrote:

[...] if you have one of those layer 8[1] problems.
[1] Political layer.

That would be layer 9, since the layer 8 security problem is, simply,
"users"[2]. "Execs" are typically layered above "users" in full conformance 
with basic layering principles[3].

No, no, no, users are physical layer devices that cause layer 8 problems.  
Execs are indistinguishable from users at the physical layer, more 
polished at the presentation layer, but originate much, much more layer 8 
traffic[1].

Paul 
[1] I originally read that as users(2), but my system happily told me:
No entry for users in section 2 of the manual.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts () patriot net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]