|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
Re: stealth firewalls
From: "Volker Tanger" <volker.tanger () discon de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:50:15 +0100
ark () eltex ru wrote:
> YOU (Volker Tanger) WROTE:
>
>> Second problem is doing VPN - or: not! Without a (visible) VPN peer
>> there is no VPN to be established.
Why not? I see no technical reason why one cannot build birdging
functionality over 100% isolated underlying VPN infrastructure and
virtual tunneling interfaces.
Okay, misunderstanding: you can not do VPN without an IP address
for the VPN peers.
If the firewall is expected to do the VPN stuff, it has
to have an IP address responding to IKE, ICMP, whatever.
But with this it is no longer a stealth (i.e. IP-addressless)
firewall.
Of course you can do VPN between two peers with a stealth firewall in
between (that is if the firewall allows), but that was not the point.
Bye
Volker
--
Volker Tanger <volker.tanger () discon de>
Wrangelstr. 100, 10997 Berlin, Germany
DiSCON GmbH - Internet Solutions
http://www.discon.de/
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () nfr com
http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: stealth firewalls, (continued)
|