|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
RE: Application requires VPN - How are these handled?
From: "Melson, Paul" <PMelson () sequoianet com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:00:59 -0500
It's certainly a valid point. Trust (or untrust) should be a two-way model, and I don't see why you should trust what
will or won't be allowed from their network to yours. Ideally, you would want to terminate this tunnel at a point
where you can then control packet and application data with a firewall of some type. Never underestimate the power of
the almighty dollar - if this is to accommodate a service you pay for, don't be afraid to ask for a solution that meets
with your organization's security policies. Only the biggest (and most foolish) vendors will let a services customer
slip away over something this relatively small.
In the event that they don't budge and you don't have other options, a DMZ or other untrusted segment is an OK way to
go. You may also consider a personal firewall for the workstation.
PaulM
-----Original Message-----
From: Michele Jordan <michele () michelejordan net>@AICNOTES
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 12:49 PM
To: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
Subject: [fw-wiz] Application requires VPN - How are these handled?
I'm curious how others are handling this situation:
Vendor has an application, that requires VPN access to the vendor's
network. I am being asked to install this on a computer and then pass
that VPN traffic through the firewall. Obviously, I am reluctant to
create a VPN from a vendor to the inside of the corporate network,
regardless of the size or name of that vendor. I am suggesting we
implement a machine on a DMZ to do this, keeping that away from the
corporate network.
Other thoughts?
Thanks
-Michele
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: tunnel vs open a hole, (continued)
|