|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
tunnel vs open a hole
From: "Anton A. Chuvakin" <anton () chuvakin org>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:53:36 -0500 (EST)
All,
Sorry for this somewhat generic query, but I'd really want to know the
general consensus on the issue from the esteemed list members. I have
seen that such debates often spark on the list, and I think summary (which
might arise as a result of my query) would be useful for everybody, so...
...if to run a new application you'd have to either:
1. open a new port
2. accept tunneling over already open port/protocol
which would you choose?
To clarify, imagine you have to have something that need to talk thru a
firewall from a less secure compartment to a more secure one. And the
options are: open TCP port XXXXX (to the required host only, of course),
or tunnel over currently open (or proxied) port 80?
Best,
--
Anton A. Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCI*
http://www.chuvakin.org
http://www.info-secure.org
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Application requires VPN - How are these handled?, (continued)
|