Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Firewall Wizards: RE: tests about latency

RE: tests about latency

From: Neale Banks <neale_at_lowendale.com.au>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:37:09 +1000 (EST)

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 TSimons_at_Delphi-Tech.com wrote:

> You may want to checkout SmokePing which works off of RRDTool. It sends 10
> pings ever 2 minutes, averages and graphs their response time and loss if
> any.

Sounds like a nice tool, thanks for the pointer. But....

> You would setup a host internally with smoke pings against the inside
> interface of the PIX, and the router just outside the PIX, then compare the
> graphs.

As the latency across the firewall hopefully isn't great, would not the
potential difference between the ping-response time of the firewall and
router be significant?

Surely such a test would be better constructed with two identical,
unloaded hosts - one just inside the FW and one just outside?

Ob FW: Whilst obviously anything that's not simply routed (e.g. proxied
protocols) would be a completely different kettle of fish, to what extent
could one then reasonably generalise the results obtained from ping tests
(i.e. ICMP packets) to other protocols?

Regards,
Neale.

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Sep 12 2003

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos