Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Firewall Wizards: RE: Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls

RE: Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls

From: Bill James <bubbagates_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:56:43 -0500

I guess what I am saying is it basically boils down to the hardware the
said ACL and Firewall is running on

 
Bill James

The objective of all dedicated employees should be to thoroughly analyze
all situations, anticipate all problems prior to their occurrence, have
answers for these problems, and move swiftly to solve these problems
when called upon.

However, When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to
remind yourself your initial objective was to drain the swamp.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus J. Ranum [mailto:mjr_at_ranum.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 5:42 PM
> To: Bill James; 'David Pick'
> Cc: firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Comparisons between Router ACLs and Firewalls
>
> Bill James wrote:
> >The problem with using ACL's is the load they can add to a
> router. Most
> >of Cisco's newer IOS' have IP Inspection and do OK but can add a
> >tremendous load on the router.
>
> I've never found any good studies of ACL performance. Do you
> have any references you can point us to?
>
> mjr.
>
>

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Jan 03 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos