Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Firewall Wizards: RE: Checkpoint vs. PIX blade

RE: Checkpoint vs. PIX blade

From: Melson, Paul <PMelson_at_sequoianet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:41:51 -0500

I'm not sure I understand what you're referring to when you say the PIX "blade type." Do you mean the FWSM blade for Cisco 7000 series routers, or do you mean the PIX rack-mountable chassis models? If you can clarify, perhaps I can better answer your question.

PaulM

> -----Original Message-----
> Hello group,
>
> I know that this issue was dealt with about 1.5-2 years ago,
> but since both
> products have advanced since, and I need to know about a
> particular type of
> PIX, namely the blade type, I would like to ask again.
>
> What are the pros/cons for each product, and what would be
> the preferred
> product for a data center type of setup? An answer from
> someone who've used
> both products in production environment is much appreciated.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Jan 21 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos