|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
Re: Re: External Load Balancing
From: Antonio Varni <antonio.varni () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:09:21 -0800
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:17:38 -0800 (PST), Roger Marquis
<marquis () roble com> wrote:
Sweet Jeebus!- don't go with F5! Their performance numbers are nowhere =
near what they claim to be (in my experience). Just waaaay too many =
exceptions to the rule.
Big/ip is really a different animal, designed for DNS-based load
balancing across physically remote networks.
Ummm, I think you're referring to their 3DNS product.
I hear that the smart folks over at UltraDNS also provide an automated
DNS based failover solution as well. About 3 years ago I set up a
active/active LVS based load balancing solution for a company. I hear
that it's been up for 3 years handling tons of traffic with no
problems. Throw in a little scripting for dynamic weighting -- and
you've got a pretty flexible load balancer.
If you don't mind delegating DNS, and need to balance across colos,
F5 is most popular tool for the job. If you're balancing within a
single colo or comm closet, however, get a Foundry.
--
Roger Marquis
Roble Systems Consulting
http://www.roble.com/
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: External Load Balancing, (continued)
|