Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres
From: "Shimon Silberschlag" <shimons () bll co il>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:23:21 +0200

Hello Group,

In the past, I used to hear the recommendation that an internet facing firewall setup should include at least 2 firewalls from different manufacturers. The reasoning behind it was that if you had a fatal vulnerability in one of them, one that could enable an attacker to "own" the first, the second one will resist a similar attack.

Today, when attacks are shifting towards using the already open ports on the firewall, at the application level, do you think that such a setup is still mandatory and/or recommended? Do you see such setups implemented? Or does most setups include a single FW with multiple DMZs, connected directly to the internal network? Perhaps the screened subnet variety with 2 FW, but the same brand, is the most popular?

TIA,

Shimon Silberschlag

+972-3-9351572
+972-50-7207130

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]