Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




firewall-wizards logo Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: PIX -> ISA -> OWA Configuration
From: Victor Williams <vbwilliams () neb rr com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 09:47:52 -0500

Personally, I didn't see any reason to state the obvious when it was there for everyone to see.

There is no *safe* or *best* way to deploy that architecture as far as I'm concerned. The sooner everyone just accepts that, the better off everyone will be.

I've found personally that a correctly implemented VPN solution is 1000 times better than trying to get OWA deployed and *safe*.


Victor Williams
Network Architect


Paul Melson wrote:

>PS - How come nobody's come back with, "The most secure option is to not use
>OWA at all and make people check their e-mail from the office like normal
>human beings." ?  If you apply that option to the risk valuation I use
>above, you get a sum of 0.  Clearly better than the rest.
>

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]