Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Firewall Wizards: Re: Firewalls & multicast- what's the choice?

Re: Firewalls & multicast- what's the choice?

From: Marcus J. Ranum <mjr_at_ranum.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:16:00 -0400

Bob Arthurs wrote:
>my company is going to build three new data centers and we are considering
>The firewalls need to be able to forward quite high volumes of mulitcast and
>interact with **PIM router** (cisco router). Traffic volumes are at least
>10s of Mbps (including unicast traffic), maybe 100s, maybe 1Gbps!

Other than that it be a "firewall" do you have anything in mind vis-a-vis
the security properties you expect from the device? Do you want URL
filtering? Attack signature-checking and blocking? Shared state failover?
Layer 7 protocol verification?

For what it's worth, there are plenty of firewalls that "handle" multicast
by simply letting it zip through. I don't know of any that do anything
especially useful above { source, dest, s_port, d_port } screening.
So if you're looking for that, you may as well just use a router. Maybe
put a big sticker on it that reads "FIREWALL" so your management
will be happy with it. ;)

mjr.

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_listserv.icsalabs.com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Aug 02 2006

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos