<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" alt="i" width="728" height="90"/></a>

Nmap Security Scanner

Docs
Security Lists

Full Disclosure

More
Security Tools

Packet crafters

More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:

edgeos

Firewall Wizards: Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?)

Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?)

From: Gabriele Buratti <gabriele.buratti_at_netasq.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:20:28 +0100

And they like "runs over http" too !

Gabriele

Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> For some reason, people _like_ firewalls
> that are more permeable to '"firewall friendly" protocols, but they
> shy away from "skull friendly" bullets. I just can't figure it out.

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

text/x-vcard attachment: gabriele_buratti_vcf

Received on Feb 08 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian Loe: "Re: parsing logs ultra-fast inline"
Previous message: Gabriele Buratti: "Re: on-the-fly-analysis vs. proxy rewrites"
In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?)"
Next in thread: Chris Byrd: "Re: IPS vs. Firewalls (why vs. ?)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]

edgeos