<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" alt="i" width="728" height="90"/></a>

Nmap Security Scanner

Docs
Security Lists

Full Disclosure

More
Security Tools

Packet crafters

More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:

edgeos

Firewall Wizards: Re: on-the-fly-analysis vs. proxy rewrites

Re: on-the-fly-analysis vs. proxy rewrites

From: Darren Reed <darrenr_at_reed.wattle.id.au>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:26:58 +1100 (EST)

> On Tuesday, February 07, 2006 12:50 PM, Dave Piscitello so spake:
>
> >An interesting exercise for this list - possibly a new thread? - is
> >"what security policies are best enforced by implementing "on-the-fly
> >analysis" versus "what security policies are best enforced by proxy
> >rewrites".

How is one different to the other ?

How is a proxy not doing something "on the fly" ?

The exception is possibly store and forward things, but apart
from email, is anything else handled in that fashion ?

Darren
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards_at_honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Received on Feb 08 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: golovast: "RE: question on securing out-of-band management (ver. 2)"
Previous message: Dave Piscitello: "Re: question on securing out-of-band management (ver. 2)"
In reply to: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "on-the-fly-analysis vs. proxy rewrites"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]

edgeos