mailing list archives
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level
From: Miha Vitorovic <mvitorovic () nil si>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 21:20:57 +0200
firewall-wizards-admin () honor icsalabs com wrote on 26.04.2006 22:18:14:
Well, that's .497 entries per second; you system can handle that
load, I bet!!! :)
Why not just put something in front of your logging routines that
filters out the
"junk" with a blacklist before letting it into the log? If you like
you could use syslog-ng and zap the stuff with a pattern, but this is
job for a 10 line C program or a 5 line perl program.
If anyone isn't aware (and I hope it isn't somewhere earlier in the
thread) PIX also supports
"no logging message <message_number>"
command for filtering any messages with 0 bit information.
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
RE: Appropriate PIX logging level Paul Melson (May 04)
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Miha Vitorovic (May 04)
RE: Appropriate PIX logging level Behm, Jeffrey L. (May 05)