mailing list archives
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:43:43 +0400
Well, does that mean that syslog should be either not reliable (generic
datagram), not portable enough (sdsc), buggy (nsyslogd) or suffering
performance problems (ng) ;-)?
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:26:48PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
?hecked out if there are any news on sdsc syslog, nothing for last 3 years :-(
Software that is over-complex for a relatively simple problem, deserves to die.
I know a lot of people worked on it (which was part of the problem!) and worked
hard, but - come on - it's only syslog.
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
RE: Appropriate PIX logging level Paul Melson (May 04)
Re: Appropriate PIX logging level Miha Vitorovic (May 04)