|
Firewall Wizards
mailing list archives
Re: Pix 520 tunnels
From: Farrukh Haroon <farrukhharoon () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:24:34 +0300
Hello John
You need to make sure that the dynamic crypto map entry is higher than the
static crypto map(s).
Please have a look at the below link:
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/How_to_configure_Site-to-Site_VPN_client_connection_on_the_same_PIX
Regards
Farrukh
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Halchishak, John <jhalchishak () ciber com>wrote:
We have two pix (actually three, one failover) 520s that I’m trying to
setup multiple tunnels. The two office locations have a tunnel up between
them with 2 peer address on the main end and a single on the other. We have
need to establish other tunnels at various times to clients. I can’t seem to
get a second tunnel up without adding it to the existing named tunnel config
as a third peer and even then it tends to flap our tunnel between the
offices. Is there some way to accomplish this scenario without causing our
tunnel problems?
*John Halchishak*
*14746 N. 78th Way*
*Scottsdale, AZ 85260*
*480-624-4927*
*480-621-2252 wc*
*623-505-8905 pc*
* *
[image: CIBER - "An Ethic of Excellence"]
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|