mailing list archives
Re: Quote cybersecurity unquote
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul () compuwar net>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:32:27 -0500
Stephen P. Berry wrote:
It is apparently national cyber security awareness month, a fact which
I was made aware of by a bunch of fluff news pieces.
I completely missed it, but I'm considering doing another advocacy thing
like Personal Firewall Day, but longer- but it won't be in November, and
it hopefully won't be under the radar.
This got me thinking: is network/information security, in the sense that
long-time readers of firewall-wizards have practiced it, a dying
In the aforementioned news coverage there's prominent discussion of
so-called hackers for hire, but none whatsoever of the sort of systems
infrastructure-focused work that I think of when I think of `security'
in the abstract. Of course this is partly due to media reporting on a
technical subject---hackers make good copy and backups and ACLs
it also seems to reflect a change in the job market as well. I've been
looking at job postings lately and there doesn't seem to be as much
for the general `security guy' the way there used to be---that sort of
apparently mostly being shifted up to the CTO level (and therefore
nothing but whitepapers) and down to the developer level (and therefore
producing nothing at all).
I don't know about the job market, but I assume all this pen testing
hoopla has someone actually doing the remediation, though I guess it may
the the companies doing the testing- that's certainly my current model.
This seems to be part of a general move away from what used to be the
traditional production operations systems and network administration
I'm sure everyone is familiar with the trend already, but I'm talking
the move toward cloud-based/virtualisation-based `solutions', and the
corresponding belief that such infrastructures don't require dedicated
and can be maintained either by programmers/developers or by
(e.g. the hosting service provider).
Of course I find this a little unsettling as a professional (on a good
working in the industry. But it also looks like a recipe for disaster
entirely from a logistical standpoint: networks and application
running on them are getting progressively more and more complex, and more
and more is riding on them, while at the same time less and less
are being devoted to the nuts-and-bolts design and implementation details
below the this-is-where-the-customer-pays-us application layer.
Is this just me being a grumpy old BOFHish sysadmin, or does this jibe
other people's perceptions as well? Is so, what's the fulcrum to which
leverage can be applied to shift the situation, if one even exists?
"Security as a Service" (*hack* </BillTheCat>)
I think dedicated security companies testing and remediating is probably
the most likely new model.
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
Re: Quote cybersecurity unquote Anton Chuvakin (Nov 10)