Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




focus-ids logo IDS mailing list archives

RE: IDS bypassing
From: "charles lindsay" <frostbackeng () lycos com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:56:16 -0500

Could you be more explicit as to which NAT devices support this evasion technique?

All NAT/PAT devices I am familiar with are either complete TCP proxies, in which case they verify the checksum coming 
in, and then re-calculate it as it goes out, or they only implement the "quick-update" algorithm (RFC 1624 et alia).  
In the first case, your evil packets get dropped at the first NAT, in the second case, they always have an incorrect 
checksum.


================ On Sun 12/29/02 at 6:44 PM ========================
============== Ed3f [ed3f () overminder com] spake: =====================

Systems Affected

     NAT/PAT/load_balancing/packet_manipulation implementations

Overview

     Multiple vendors' implementations of
NAT/PAT/load_balancing/packet_manipulation
     calculate level 4 checksum from scratch.

<< snip>>



_____________________________________________________________
Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus&ref=lmtplus


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • IDS bypassing Ed3f (Dec 30)
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • RE: IDS bypassing charles lindsay (Dec 30)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]