IDS: RE: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots

["Rob Shein" <shoten () starpower net>]

I have to agree entirely.  A lot of people think of a honeypot as something
set up to look like a wildly insecure box.  What I like to do is set one up
to look like most of the other network-available boxes, but with a slight
twist, like an open port that the others don't have.  It doesn't have to be
incredibly appealing, just a chink in the armor will draw attackers to it.
In "The Seven Samurai," the leader of the group states "Every good castle
must have a weakness in its defense."  He then uses that deliberate weakness
to lure attackers to that one spot, where he waits.  That's exactly what I
go for with a honeypot, and it works pretty darn well too :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lance Spitzner [mailto:lance () honeynet org] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: Robert Graham
> Cc: Focus on Intrusion Detection Systems; slyph () alum mit edu
> Subject: Re: Protocol Anomaly Detection IDS - Honeypots
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Robert Graham wrote:
>
> > People have been hoping that there is some sort of magic-pill 
> > technology that solves the problem of IDS. "Protocol-anomaly 
> > detection" is one of those buzzwords that promises a magic pill.
> Okay, I'll admit, to me alot of the security problems I see 
> are nothing more then nails, and honeypots are the hammer.  
> However, seriously, have folks considered the detection 
> capabilities of honeypots?  The reason I bring this up in 
> this thread, is for honeypots, everything is an anamoly.  The 
> concept of a honeypot is it has no production or authorized 
> activity.  
> Everything it captures its way is most likely malicious 
> activity.  Not only that, but you dramaticaly reduce 'noise'. 
>  Instead of dealing with 5,000 alerts a day (not that high of 
> a number for many organizations) a 
> honeypot in the same environment could only generate 5 or 10 
> alerts a day, 
> alerts you most likely need to take action on.  These small 
> data sets can make it far easier and cost effective to 
> identify and act on 
> unauthorized activity.
>
> I'm in no way suggesting that honeypots replace any existing 
> detection technologies, I'm suggesting that can contribute.  
> Personally, I feel the concept of deception has overshadowed 
> the value of honeypots, when one of their true values lies in 
> detection.
>
> lance
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Does your IDS have Intelligent Attack Profiling?
> If not, see what you're missing.
> Download a free 15-day trial of StillSecure Border Guard. 
> http://www.securityfocus.com/stillsecure

-----------------------------------------------------------
Does your IDS have Intelligent Attack Profiling?
If not, see what you're missing.
Download a free 15-day trial of StillSecure Border Guard.
http://www.securityfocus.com/stillsecure