|
IDS
mailing list archives
RE: IDS requirement
From: "SecurIT Informatique Inc." <securit () iquebec com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 01:22:53 -0500
I agree with Nelson, in the fact that for most people, the term IPS means
only one type of technology. The "IDS is dead" Gartner report surely
didn't help at correcting this situation.
I would only add that the IPS system (either NIPS or HIPS) will only be as
good as the underlying IDS engine under it (either built-in or
third-party). Most network-based systems work on the "known
vulnerabilities" principles, meaning that this kind of systems usually
performs poorly against 0-day exploits. A system based on "known secure
state" of your machines, or "white list" seems more promising against
unknown vulnerabilities. And by design, HI(D|P)S are more appropriate for
this approach that NI(D|P)S.
Ideally, I think that both methods should be used, if just for the sake of
security in layers.
My 2 cents.
Floydman
At 03:03 PM 01/12/2004, Brito, Nelson (ISS Brazil) wrote:
I disagree, because the IPS concept is misunderstood for almost
everybody.
IPS, as you said, is Intrusion Prevention (some people says Protection)
System.
IMHO, IPS is something between the source of attack and the target,
blocking or stopping the attack in real time, without interaction (or
any kind of re-configuration) with other device / application.
The IPS, by default, uses its own engine to do that, which means that
IPS does not need to re-configure nor Firewalls neither Routers to block
or stop a threat, even because IPS is not just a technology to use
protecting network segments. It is a concept, as I said bellow, between
the source of attack and the target. It can be a HIPS, stopping the
attack before it reaches the target (OS).
So, briefly, IPS can be:
1 - A network engine to stop attacks before they reach the target
systems, a device in other words;
2 - An engine installed on a machine which stops the attacks before they
reach the machine, an engine working in Kernel space or even in a lowest
level.
Sorry my broken English, it is not my main Language, by the way.
Cheers.
- nb
{(!($^O=~/^[M]*$32/i)&&($0=~s!^.*/!!))||($0=~s!.*\\!!)}print$0;
-----Original Message-----
From: Jimi Thompson [mailto:jimi.thompson () gmail com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:35 AM
To: skill2die4 () secguru com
Cc: Raj B; focus-ids () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: IDS requirement
I realize that I'm a bit late here, but it's been a holiday. We had a
similar discussion on the SNORT mailing list recently and I'll distill
it down for you. The general concensus is that IPS is mostly marketing
hype. Unless you are doing something to identify an attack in progress
in real time and actively doing something (i.e. modifying a firewall
rule or routing table) to stop that attack, you are not an IPS, because
you are not, by definition, preventing anything.
IDS = intrusion detection system
IPS = intrusion prevention system
HTH,
Jimi
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:28:28 -0600 (CST), skill2die4 () secguru com
<skill2die4 () secguru com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Can anyone email me a document on how IDS/IPS actually
> > works.....with the terminology well explained.
> >
>
> IMHO, articles of your interest would be :
>
> FAQ's
> ============
> [FAQ] Sniffing (network wiretap, sniffer)
> [FAQ] IDS
>
> Terminology
> =============
> [AndyCuff] Intrusion Detection Terminology
> [A.Cliff] Intrusion Detection Systems Terminology
>
> Basic Papers
> ===============
> [SecurityFocus] An Introduction to Intrusion Detection Systems
> [SecurityFocus] Network Intrusion Detection Signatures [SecurityFocus]
> Intrusion Detection: Filling in the Gaps [Cisco] Intrusion Detection
> Planning Guide
>
> links to all the above is availabe at,
>
> http://www.secguru.com/index.php/content/category/6/145/115/
> [ www.secguru.com -> Network Devices -> IDS ]
>
> Also , visit Andy Cuff's site : http://www.networkintrusion.co.uk/
> for much info ... :-)
>
> HTH,
>
> -=skillz=-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: IDS requirement Jimi Thompson (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IDS requirement Brito, Nelson (ISS Brazil) (Dec 02)
- Message not available
- RE: IDS requirement SecurIT Informatique Inc. (Dec 06)
|