|
IDS
mailing list archives
Re: True definition of Intrusion Prevention
From: Mike Poor <mike () digitalguardian net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:49:30 -0500
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:02:57PM -0500, George Capehart wrote:
Having the ability to block a detected attack instead of just
reporting on it.
That's not intrusion *prevention*, it's intrusion *blocking*. ;-)
I'm being pedantic ... <snip>
Well, if we are being pedantic, then what you are discussing is Attack blocking, as you still have no idea if the
attack would end up being a successful intrusion.
Same goes for NIDS (which I personally think despite the acronym should be NADS for Network Attack Detection System).
Just because it begins with an I and ends with an S does not make IPS an IDS killer.
We still need to have:
Policy
Policy enforcement (firewall, IPS, application level firewall, router acls, anti-virus gateway etc)
Audit function (IDS, audit trail such as tripwire, argus, niksun, various ESM products etc)
Change control
my $0.02
Mike Poor
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|