Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

default list reply-to: address
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (martin f krafft)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 10:56:41 +0200

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Roland Postle <mail () blazde co uk> [2002.07.17.0344 +0200]:
For what it's worth, I prefer it that way. With the exception of
securityfocus' lists, all the mailing lists I'm on do it that way. It's w=
hat
I'm used to, and, since the majority of replies go to the list not the
individual who wrote the original post, it makes sense.

Which is why proper mail clients handle this appropriately. In Mutt,
I press 'r' to reply to the author, 'l' to reply to the list, and 'g'
to reply to both. Obviously this breaks when Reply-To is set...

Anyway, I give you this to read:
  http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

The [Full-Disclosure] in the subject (that someone else objected to) I li=
ke
as well, but I don't have such good reasons. I just like it.

It wastes bandwidth and doesn't add information that you couldn't add
on the client-side. I am opposed.

--=20
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net () madduck
=20
quantum mechanics: the dreams stuff is made of.

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj01MUkACgkQIgvIgzMMSnVi5wCeMtH9ovZ4+S8dpLV5OGanS4A8
D64AoIBj9o9s1h/lqsCjq0oHXLiJtU6K
=7Z70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]