|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Cox is blocking port 135 - off topic
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:27:07 +1200
joey2cool () yahoo com wrote:
cox does block port 445 also, but i havent seen any
exploits that use that port. even though its said that
port 445 is vulnerable, where is the POC?
Well, regardless of whether there are any DCOM RPC exploits or worms
based thereon using 445 or not, there certainly are many other worms
and scripted distribution mechanisms used for RATs, IRC bot net agents,
etc that either deliberatly only target, or incidentally use port 445.
As the level of activity of these things has been high for some time
and that port is typically exposed by default in the most vulnerable
groups of users, ISPs catering to those market segments would do well
to consider blocking those ports, at least on their dial-up and other
"consumer" offerings.
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Cox is blocking port 135 - off topic, (continued)
|