Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Cox is blocking port 135 - off topic
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:27:07 +1200

joey2cool () yahoo com wrote:

cox does block port 445 also, but i havent seen any
exploits that use that port. even though its said that
port 445 is vulnerable, where is the POC?

Well, regardless of whether there are any DCOM RPC exploits or worms 
based thereon using 445 or not, there certainly are many other worms 
and scripted distribution mechanisms used for RATs, IRC bot net agents, 
etc that either deliberatly only target, or incidentally use port 445. 
As the level of activity of these things has been high for some time 
and that port is typically exposed by default in the most vulnerable 
groups of users, ISPs catering to those market segments would do well 
to consider blocking those ports, at least on their dial-up and other 
"consumer" offerings.


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]