|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign
From: Anne Carasik <gator () mail cacr caltech edu>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:46:19 -0700
OpenPGP is free :) as are other implementations of PGP.
Paying VeriSign to create a digital certificate for you
is not worth it, considering most of the encryption you
run into in the wild is PGP keys.
-Anne
Kamal Habayeb grabbed a keyboard and typed...
Greetings,
I'm trying to get some expert opinions on which is better. Using Outlook
2002, would it be better to use PGP to encrypt messages or use the built-in
option with a digital certificate from Verisign (or some other CA)?
Thanks,
Kamal
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
--
.-"".__."``". Anne Carasik, System Administrator
.-.--. _...' (/) (/) ``' gator at cacr dot caltech dot edu
(O/ O) \-' ` -="""=. ', Center for Advanced Computing Research
~`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|