Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign
From: Jason <security () brvenik com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:55:30 -0400


yossarian wrote:
What I wonder - will Verisign have set up CRL servers yet? Remember the IE
problem when someone got hold of MS certificates? The MS-fix was
blacklisting them locally, the real problem was that there was no revocation
servers. Then again, how many concurrent connections would they get if MS
sent out a critical update?

So - stick to PGP - forget about PKI.
IIRC, the problem was not that Verisign could not revoke the keys it was that IE had no way of checking the revocation status, It was a MS implementation problem not a problem with the issuing authority. This has been resolved in IE ( in some places ) and you can now enable the revocation checking however it is not enabled by default.

Google provided a good place to brush up on the incident.
http://www.amug.org/~glguerin/opinion/revocation.html


[snip] ...

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]