Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [Snort-sigs] Re: Mystery DNS Changes
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:07:40 -0500

--On Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:29 AM -0500 Paul Tinsley <pdt () jackhammer org> wrote:

Someone brought to my attention that I neglected udp (thank you Adam),
sorry about that I was in a hurry when I posted this, there is another
just like the tcp one that says udp :)  Both are being triggered by the
clients affected as one would expect, so for full coverage, do both.

Wouldn't it make more sense to use:

alert ip $HOME_NET any > $MAL_DNS 53 blah, blah, blah....instead of having two rules?

(That's what I'm using, and it's working fine.)

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]