|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:06:46 +0300
This user Bullmur should be carefull with the word "criminal".
Question to the lawyers on the list:
It is my understanding that "criminal" is someone who breaks the law.
microsoft seem to have been found guilty by a court in the antitrust trial, so they seem to have broken the law.
Are microsoft criminals from legal point of view?
Or does justice work this way: if you deface a website, you are a criminal, but if you screw most of the internet you
are a hero?
georgi
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:54:12 -0700
<dhtml () hush com> wrote:
"Hackers are criminals" Most, he notes, release their malicious code
after patches for Microsoft software have been released, meaning that
they are simply reverse engineering to exploit security weaknesses or
holes in software. - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
'ninkum`poop [n] a stupid foolish person See Also: simple, simpleton
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|