Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:18:37 -0500

At 01:32 PM 10/1/03 -0700, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:

Reality - the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) likely will not even
make the effort to prosecute computer crimes that cannot be said to have
caused significant (like US$500,000) amounts of damage. It's just not
worth the time and resources for them to assign people to port scanning.

Minor point: the reason the FBI is unlikely to investigate crimes
with smaller dollar amounts is because the US Attorney's Office
will not prosecute them.  Since the FBI is a federal agency, it
investigates federal crimes, and those crimes are prosecuted
by the US Attorney's Office. The FBI can only pursue cases with
the potential for successful prosecution, ergo the monetary
damage limitation (although it's more like $5,000 than $500,000).
Also remember that the DOJ generally only prosecutes felonies,
and these often have lower monetary boundaries.  That's why
it's very important if you want to bring in law enforcement
that you make a credible attempt at quantifying your losses first.

m5x

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]