Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool...
From: "Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway technolabs net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:13:54 +0530


Well, that really depends, doesn't it.  We're doing IPSEC using AES for 
wireless on a test network.  It's a good deal more secure than our wired 
network, which is still plain text.

this sure is plain text but when combined with switches ( yes i know they can be degraded to act like hubs ) it is not 
broadcasting any info. so unless the intruder manages to get a physical wire in the net it is *very* secure

IPSEC with aes could just be implemented over the wired net also if there is such a requirment

-aditya
 


________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]