--- Begin Message ---
From: "muts" <muts () inter net il>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:42:15 +0200
Then you're obviously not a "Whitehat" :)
BUT, your point is taken, and I will not release any more half baked sploits
into the wild.
From: John [mailto:JohnH () secnetops com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit
The only point I see is, If you are going to do something you might as
well do it correctly or not do it at all. If you get popular in the
doing so, then so be it.
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 14:06, muts wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, the point isn't to get a *working exploit* out to the
public, but more of a proof of concept to point out a vulnerability.
The only reason to release a *fully* working exploit out to the wild would
be to get popular amongst the script kiddies. Well done, you're popular
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of JohnH
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:38 AM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Cc: bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit
Here you go guys. A fully working Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit. This will
work on any windows OS. 100% universal.
Only reason I am posting this is because im sick of seeing non working
exploits released and WHITEHAT.CO.IL likes to do this.
Johnh () secnetops com
--- End Message ---