Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Cool Web Search
From: "JacK" <jack () websecurite org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:16:13 +0200

Message: 30
From: "Gregh" <chows () ozemail com au>

Sorry but totally and utterly incorrect. You just do NOT understand what I
have typed. I said that I used HiJackThis to list the entries in a group
then ticked them manually and then removed them. Along with that, it
you to identify the exe files that went with it.

Rather you don't understand what we are speaking about : we discuss new
tricky CWS variants

If you dont understand that then I can understand that you dont know how
get rid of it but the truth is that this way DOES get rid of it. There are
at LEAST 5 variants of CWS. I have met them all and beat them all.

Oh ?  I know at least 30 :-D
The old ones are very kind and you can easily get rid of it the way you give
but for the new ons, you may forget it :o)

If you don't understand that there are new variants, it's useless trying to
explain how to get rid of the classic variants : anybody know how to handle
them. It DOES NOT WORK for the newer variants. Is that beyond your understanding ?

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]