mailing list archives
RE: PIX vs CheckPoint
From: John.Airey () rnib org uk
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:38:36 +0100
From: Gary E. Miller [mailto:gem () rellim com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 00:58
To: Eric Paynter
Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Eric Paynter wrote:
administrators had finished their Cisco training, they said
never go back to FW-1 because the PIX interface was so much
easier to use.
I agree, except for one small problem. Don't you still have to delete
ALL the filter rules, and reenter them ALL to change the order of the
rules? last I checked there was no "insert before", "insert
at top" sort
of options. Just "insert at end". This and other features can really
slow down the otherwise decent CLI.
No longer true. The latest versions of the PIX CLI allow you to specify
which line numbers, so you can insert rules where you want.
Another bad thing about the PIX CLI is that is looks a lot
like the IOS CLI,
but has lots of subtle differences that will byte you when
you least expect
Can you name one? I find it a pain the other way round, like not being able
to "write mem" when in configuration.
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey () rnib org uk
I don't know which is worse. The makers of soap operas thinking they portray
real life or those that watch them thinking it is real life!
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.
RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint John . Airey (Jul 01)