Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: How big is the danger of IE?
From: "Eric Paynter" <eric () arcticbears com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:04:08 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, July 8, 2004 2:17 pm, joe said:

http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/713878

The link above is the advisory that theregister is talking about. I know
it is unusual for theregister but they seemed to have missed a hefty part
of the whole advisory when reporting it.

Yes, we've all seen it. I'm pretty sure that was posted here a few days ago.

The amazing part is that CERT, a vendor-neutral organization who usually
only provides information about how to secure a product, who does not
counsel on product choice, has made a recommendation to consider
alternatives to IE. Have they ever made such a recommendation in the past?
Certainly not that I'm aware of.

They must really think IE is simply not a viable tool for use on the
Internet. And since IE is an integral part of Windows (according to sworn
testimony by MS), then that would imply Windows is not a viable tool for
use on the Internet.

-Eric

--
arctic bears - affordable email and name services
http://www.arcticbears.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault