mailing list archives
From: Richard Silver <richard.silver () eamc org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:52:44 -0500
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 15:07, Leif Sawyer wrote:
On Mon, July 19, 2004, Eric Paynter replied to:
nicolas vigier, whom said:
Not to mention all the vendors out there whose products have
assinine restrictions, because they can't be bothered to code
Think Cisco, for one.
I personally think that _EVERYBODY_ with a CCO contract should
open up a TAC case complaining that X-application (website,
RME, VMS, etc..) doesn't work with a W3C-Standards Compliant
browser, nor with latest-bug-fixed JREs.
I've already got mine open, but of course "Use I.E. or some
old version of Netscape Navigator, and an old JRE!" is the
typical response. They need a lot more prodding to keep their
security platform up-to-date with security standards.
I have been griping to my Cisco sales team for years (being an Ex-Cisco
SE myself) about the dismal support for any browser but IE. I could dump
IE entirely were it not for my Call Manager.
At least it seems that some of the products that they acquired that were
initially cross-platform usually remain fairly browser-agnostic.
Sr Network Engineer
East Alabama Medical Center
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
RE: IE Leif Sawyer (Jul 19)
RE: IE J.A. Terranson (Jul 20)
- RE: IE Richard Silver (Jul 19)
RE: IE Daniel Hedblom (Jul 20)
RE: IE Jos Osborne (Jul 20)
RE: IE Kliarsky, Adam D. (Jul 20)
- Re: IE Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 20)
- Re: IE Georgi Guninski (Jul 20)