Full Disclosure: RE: PIX vs CheckPoint

["Abraham, Antony (Cognizant)" <Antony.Abraham () cognizant com>]

Then you would have some static statement which covers the network in questions. PIX need some sort of translation for 
its ASA (Adaptive Security Algorithm) to work, so a "static" covers the network range would do...

-Antony

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Cyril 
Guibourg
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:18 PM
To: Otero, Hernan (EDS)
Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

"Otero, Hernan         (EDS)" <HOtero () lanchile cl> writes:

> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s
and may contain confidential and privileged information.If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying
of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.

 Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html