Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February
From: "Epic" <epic () hack3r com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 -0700

Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were
any communications infrastructure.



-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of flatline
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:45 PM
To: Gregory A. Gilliss; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February

Gregory,

What makes you think F-D's "signal" would consist solely of advisories?
If 
you've read the list charter 
(http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html), you should know
to 
not only filter on the word "advisory".

Your method of generating a signal:noise relation seems far from
correct.

/ flatline

At 11:41 PM 24-03-2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
List:

Just for fun I decided to calculate the S/N ratio of FD. I used the
data from February 2004 (the last full month available). Here's my
methodology (for those who can do better :-):

[ snip ]  

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault