Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: PGP attachments (was: NEVER open attachments)
From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:00:09 -0300

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
inline signing sucks, because there are not many mailers which can
verify inline signings.

Actually, there is a procmail workaround (for those who can use it) for
this issue:

# PGP
:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
        :0 fBw
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
        * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
        | formail \
            -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt"

        :0 fBw
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
        * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
        * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
        | formail \
            -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign"
}

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAYsnJpdyWzQ5b5ckRAtX+AJ9JvBpjHwh5atIZAY8y8od8Vlg4vwCfaQxp
ibXbv7rYwn0A4uba5wO3C+E=
=J//X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]