mailing list archives
Re: Talk in #grsecurity
From: peter () devbox adamantix org (Peter Busser)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:12:16 +0100
I was there and the conversation most certainly happened, in fact you
can see when i joined in the pasted converstation.
The reason the conversation was posted is because this is full
disclosure where I assume at least the majority of people actually
believe in full disclosure and people keeping vulnerabilities secret
isn't exactly kosher. This in particular is what i'm refering to
[22:40] <BlackNet> how many do you have that's not released?
[22:41] <spender> 2 for exec-shield
[22:41] <spender> 3 for systrace
[22:41] <spender> 1 for DTE
[22:41] <spender> ~10 for LIDS
[22:42] <BlackNet> that's alot
[22:42] <spender> oh
[22:42] <spender> 3 i think for linsec
[22:43] <BlackNet> all of these are non-reported?
[22:43] <spender> correct
So I ask grsecurity fans, why would you run the software of someone no
better than the people trying to crack your machine? This is not
responsible behaviour and shows a clear disregard for security and
safety of others.
What I wonder is: Why would Brad specifically target exec-shield and Fedora? I
mean, with 10 zero-day bugs, doesn't this mean that LIDS would be a much more
It couldn't have anything to do with the way the people from the company
behind exec-shield have treated people from competing projects, such as
gr-security. Could it?
FYI, I don't know Brad Spender. I am not a gr-security user and neither am I a
gr-security fan. Although I can understand what he is doing, I don't approve
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.